Return to Trade Team Index | Return to Main Index | The Environmental Impact of NAFTA



The Environmental Impact of NAFTA
by Jackie Salit of New York

"Along both sides of the U.S.-Mexican border are numerous environmental and health experts, citizen activists and organizations rich with recommendations of how to improve the environmental and health conditions of their region. With the stakes as high as their families' health and the state of the environment in which they pass every day of their lives, carefully developed ideas and public support for border improvements have never been absent. Rather, such ideas have been too often ignored Ð by the politicians and companies who pushed NAFTA approval and by local governments and businesses lusting for investment under NAFTA at any environmental or public health costs." - Public Citizen Global Trade Watch 1995

The unregulated expansion of North American trade has made an already heavily polluted border region much dirtier and more dangerous and the institutions created by NAFTA to handle environmental and public safety problems have proven to be wholly inadequate.

Many of the promises made by advocates of NAFTA to relieve the existing environmental pressures, were based on the premise that NAFTA would eliminate the incentive for factories to locate in the Mexican border free trade zone where 2000 companies and ten million workers have crowded largely without residential sewage, water treatment facilities or hazardous waste removal systems. Known as the Maquilador, the area is an environmental and health disaster called a "cesspool of infectious diseases" by the American Medical Association.

But rather than diminish, the Maquiladora industry has grown vigorously in the years since NAFTA took effect, transforming from assembly plants to full-on manufacturing facilities. As both the industrial and border-area populations have grown, so has airborne pollution from industry, cooking and heating fuel and increased commercial and private transportation in the border area. Here plants producing and using toxic chemicals and solvents, and unhealthy operations such as lead smelters and glass factories that burn old tires as fuel, operate without environmental rules.

Citizens on both sides of the border suffer from alarming rates of hepatitis, chronic diarrhea and tuberculosis. Contamination by toxic industrial wastes and chemicals has been linked to the clusters of cancer, rare birth defects like anancephaly where a full-term baby is born with an incomplete or missing brain and/or skull and immunological diseases. From Texas to California, tuberculosis and hepatitis rates continue to climb since NAFTA; from 2 - 5 times the U.S. average. The word's highest rate of Lupus also occurs in the border area.

Other indications of NAFTA's health and environmental hazards include:

Mexico has put on hold participation in border environmental projects because the economic crisis has led to a nearly 10% cut in the federal budget. Because Mexico imports most of the equipment necessary for hazardous waste disposal, sewage treatment and other environmental cleanup, the collapse on the value of the peso has made this equipment more than 50% more expense. Extensive new water and sewage treatment facilities that were touted by NAFTA proponents have not been completed and several water and sewer projects underway before NAFTA have been halted as a result of the Mexican economic depression.

The NAFTA clean up plan for the U.S. Mexico border has failed, generating only 1 percent of the promised cleanup money. Commissions created by NAFTA partners such as CEC [Commission for Environmental Cooperation] and the BECC [Border Environmental Cooperation Commission] have been heavily criticized by pubic citizen groups who note they are rendered impotent by conflicts of interest, a lack of funding and organization, no power to investigate independently, and capital funds rendered inaccessible to the poorest communities by high rates and a payback requirement.

Return to Top

Return to Trade Team | Return to Index

Copyright © 1997 | Reform Party of California | Revised: September 16, 1997